Today, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that is normally used for even ten percent of its potential.
What's it to get the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", when the person has fastened his wrist to the maximum after a dip and a couple of strokes, return instantly to couch under the umbrella?
If that is their principal use, it's merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of this contemporary era that dates back to the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the category can boast, was tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of their well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famed documentary -movie additionally winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist thanks to his fabric strap became a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown shield shoulders, imitated a bit by everybody.
These are only a couple of the very first cases that reveal - fiction or fact - for more than fifty years, the press - driven by the watch sector - determined the diver watches ought to be the very first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day that the brands when it came to describing their models began to use the phrase: "suitable for any occasion".
The 007 change, unfortunately also the legendary "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanisms of the most famous secret agent in the world, and obviously also the watch whose role has been played by the Omega Seamaster for many years.
But beyond their actual use in this large family whose origins would only have to deal with "hard even more than steel", today there are also versions so bejeweled to dread even once you need to wash the palms.
But a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let us just mention the features and constructive characteristics of those references.
I've a long standing friend who's an expert diver and that, throughout his diving at the Persian Gulf, makes 100 percent of his diving watch - like that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to guarantee the following performances:
Excellent visibility during the dive
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its movement, either quartz or mechanical
However, the tests didn't end here: today professional diving website watches must adhere to specific rules such as those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, that which we know is the best, the best sub may be ultimately a watchable to provide attributes much milder and easier to manage.
I remember that in order to only immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 get more info ATM (approximately 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but that is not so when it is done a banal swim in the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely to a screw-on crown better still when protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
And the safety on the waterproof status of this submerged timepieces?
Just for people who would never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dive watch might have to be hurried into a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on very few versions, which honestly I don't understand why.
You might have worn your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to visit the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have forgotten to screw the crown tightly. It is the most common case.
Suggestion - When you have worn the costume decide on the fly : leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily create a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a little 'of issues related to the time that must meet with the water, and also given the essential advice, I show you which - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I have divided them into two categories. The sequence in which they appear doesn't signify any ranking.